Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash

Context

A rail network project required BIM models for one client team and drawings/documentation for another. Multiple organisations (discipline consultants and external modellers) needed to collaborate under strict digital engineering standards and toolsets.

My role

  • Identified an early mismatch between client department expectations and convened a joint working session to align delivery approach

  • Interpreted extensive client BIM documentation into a clear delivery plan (IDP + model responsibility table) aligned to submission gates and quality expectations

  • Produced exchange / delivery documentation for our scope (DEXP) and supporting requirements documentation

  • Set up collaboration across platforms (including Revizto workflows and clash investigation) and supported delivery into client systems

  • Mentored external modellers on geolocation, standards, and interpreting requirements

  • Coached managers and engineers to adopt CDE-based issue tagging and collaboration practices

Deliverables

  • IDP + delivery responsibility table, DEXP, and supporting requirements documentation

  • Fully developed, geo-coordinated building model integrating architectural, civil/structural, and electrical equipment inputs

  • Clash investigation setup and outputs

  • Drawing/documentation packages

  • Collaboration cadence (issue tagging workflow + facilitated coordination meetings)

Outcome

Galvanised four organisations and two client teams into a single, workable delivery approach. Improved alignment on standards, geolocation, and responsibilities, enabling smooth submission gates and credible digital engineering collaboration. Coached 5 people across 3 organisations, with positive client feedback for resolving complex operational and inter-organisational challenges.

Related services

If you’re facing conflicting BIM vs drawing requirements, multi-party coordination, or CDE adoption issues, send your situation:
Get in Touch